global debt network automotive
This is an election year in the United States. Politicians from both major political parties continue to present their initiatives for the first appointment power presidential. The Democratic candidate Barrack Obama has a long list of new spending promises, with the slogan "Yes we can". Meanwhile, Republican John McCain wants continue spending on the Iraq war in the future. In Congress, there is no desire to reduce federal spending and questionable spending practices "dedicates" continues without real reform.
Meanwhile, the Federal debt ITS is now approaching 9.5 trillion dollars and is about to get worse as the rate of National unemployment is now rising. The burden of federal debt is now about U.S. $ 79,000 per taxpayer. Therefore, the current federal debt, recession the economic war in Iraq and the campaign promises the new year is a formula that would mean one thing for the average taxpayer American region: the higher income taxes.
However, it is as if taxes are not high enough already. In 2008, Americans work each day of New Year to 23 April, just to pay their taxes. Work will take 74 days to pay federal taxes and 39 days extra work to pay state and local taxes. Americans spend more on taxes in 2008 than they spend on food, clothing and housing costs combined.
As the two political parties in Washington DC to possibility of raising income taxes in the coming years, there is a unique new tax that is already under study in several major U.S. cities. It is a longer generates tax revenue in cities like London, Milan, Stockholm and Singapore. It's called the "congestion tax" and its application is feared by the passengers in vehicles in major U.S. cities. The rate is based on a vehicle within a city or area designated City. The tax is applied to the input in the car in the designated area.
London could be a model for managing congestion tax in major U.S. cities. The congestion charge in London has begun a commuter tax of eight dollars per car. This tax has doubled recently to Daily gas vehicles in small and large vehicles and pay a fee of $ 50 daily congestion. London has no tollbooths or barriers around the area of congestion charging and not that physical tickets or passes are required. Monitoring is done through a network of the leading camera at each entrance and exit in the tax area and in the area. Each site the camera has at least one color camera + monochrome camera for each lane being monitored. The camera captures the car plate number and people pay tax base of the photos.
The stated purpose of the congestion charge is to clean the environment by reducing C02 emissions in the automobile traffic in traffic congested areas of large cities. The fee acts as an incentive for motorists to use transport. The benefits of greater use of public transport would improve air quality, reduce traffic congestion and improve public health by reducing pollution air.
New York is one of at least five cities in the United States taking into account the implementation of a congestion tax. The initial charge for drivers of vehicles entering the congestion zone in New York would be more than eight dollars per day. There is also an additional incentive for the city of New York because of the promise of $ 354 million in federal grants to create a congestion zone.
Consider the implications of these federal grants for a time, if desired. A taxpayer who pays federal taxes and the government uses this money as tax incentives for urban local governments to initiate a load additional tax on motorists to solve the bottlenecks of local traffic. It is certainly difficult for a taxpayer's income tax federal used as an incentive for cities to create local prices based on new taxes.
In fact, a tax to the May congestion have bad consequences for local businesses and jobs to the city. What the congestion tax will do is drive business away from local urban centers to the suburbs, where the movement of workers and business customers do not pay road tax. In addition, CAB rates in large cities will be increased so that a passenger to enter a congestion zone.
In fact, there is no scientific evidence that global warming in the long term is of human origin and the result of the increased emission CO2 in the atmosphere. Consider that the recent warming of the planet, is probably the result of the length of the solar cycle of the sun. In fact, the congestion tax is actually a tax wolf in sheep environment clothes. The truth is that it's just another unnecessary tax burden on the worker and the consumer for less will not save the planet from global warming.
About the Author:
James William Smith has worked in Senior management positions for some of the largest Financial Services firms in the United States for the last twenty five years. He has also provided business consulting support for insurance organizations and start up businesses. Visit his website at http://www.eWorldvu.com
Article Source: ArticlesBase.com – A Congestion Tax Will not Save the Planet
